·

What’s Happening to Jupiter’s Great Red Spot? The Solar System’s Largest Storm Could Finally Disappear

Published at 2024-08-27 11:40:54Viewed 485 times
Please reprint with source link

Jupiter’s Great Red Spot (GRS), an easily visible anticyclonic vortex and the largest such vortex in the Solar System, has intrigued scientists since it was first observed through telescopes centuries ago. Recent research, including simulations and space mission data, has investigated its formation, stability, and the possibility of it shrinking or disappearing in the future. Credit: NASA, ESA, A. Simon (Goddard Space Flight Center), and M.H. Wong (University of California, Berkeley)

Jupiter’s Great Red Spot is a giant vortex that has existed for at least 190 years. Recent studies suggest it is distinct from an earlier observed spot, and simulations explore how Jupiter’s winds may have shaped it. The GRS has been shrinking, and future research will focus on its sustainability and potential future disintegration.

Jupiter’s Great Red Spot (GRS) stands out as one of the most iconic features in the Solar System. This massive atmospheric structure, currently spanning a diameter equal to that of Earth, is easily recognizable due to its striking reddish hue, which contrasts sharply with Jupiter’s pale cloud tops. Even small telescopes can capture its distinct appearance. The GRS is a gigantic anticyclonic vortex, with winds reaching speeds of 450 km/h along its outer edges. It holds the title of the largest and longest-lasting vortex in the atmospheres of any planet in our Solar System. However, the exact age of the GRS is still debated, and the processes behind its formation remain a mystery.

Speculation about the origin of the GRS dates back to the first telescopic observations made by the astronomer Giovanni Domenico Cassini, who in 1665 discovered a dark oval at the same latitude as the GRS and named it the ‘Permanent Spot’ (PS), since it was observed by him and other astronomers until 1713.

Track of it was subsequently lost for 118 years and it was not until 1831 and later years that S. Schwabe again observed a clear structure, roughly oval in shape and at the same latitude as the GRS; that can be regarded as the first observation of the current GRS, perhaps of a nascent GRS. Since then, the GRS has been observed regularly by means of telescopes and by the various space missions that have visited the planet right up to the present day.

Analyzing the GRS’s Evolution

In the study, the authors first analyzed the evolution of its size over time, its structure, and the movements of both meteorological formations, the former PS and the GRS; to do so, they used historical sources dating back to the mid-17th century, shortly after the invention of the telescope.

From left to right: Enrique García-Melendo (UPC) Agustín Sánchez Lavega and Jon Legarreta (UPV/EHU). Credit: Fernando Gómez. UPV/EHU

“From the measurements of sizes and movements, we deduced that it is highly unlikely that the current GRS was the PS observed by G. D. Cassini. The PS probably disappeared sometime between the mid-18th and 19th centuries, in which case we can say that the longevity of the Red Spot now exceeds 190 years at least,” explained Agustín Sánchez-Lavega, professor of physics at the UPV/EHU and who led this research. The Red Spot, which in 1879 was 39,000 km in size at its longest axis, has been shrinking to about the current 14,000 km and simultaneously becoming more rounded.

Recent Findings and Simulation Studies

What is more, since the 1970s several space missions have studied this meteorological phenomenon closely. Recently, “various instruments on board the Juno mission in orbit around Jupiter have shown that the GRS is shallow and thin when compared to its horizontal dimension, as vertically it is about 500 km long,” explained Sánchez-Lavega.

To find out how this immense vortex could have formed, the UPV/EHU and UPC teams carried out numerical simulations on Spanish supercomputers, such as the BSC’s MareNostrum IV, part of the Spanish Supercomputing Network (RES), using two types of complementary models of the behavior of thin vortices in Jupiter’s atmosphere. Predominating on the giant planet are intense wind currents that flow along the parallels alternating in their direction with the latitude. To the north of the GRS, winds blow in a westerly direction at speeds of 180 km/h while to the south, they blow in the opposite direction, in an easterly direction, at speeds of 150 km/h. This generates a huge north-south shear in wind speed, which is a basic ingredient enabling the vortex to grow inside it.

In the research, a range of mechanisms were explored to explain the genesis of the GRS, including the eruption of a gigantic superstorm, similar to those rarely observed on the twin planet Saturn, or the merging of multiple smaller vortices produced by wind shear. The results indicate that, although an anticyclone forms in both cases, it differs in terms of shape and dynamic properties from those of the present GRS. “We also think that if one of these unusual phenomena had occurred, it or its consequences in the atmosphere must have been observed and reported by the astronomers at the time,” said Sánchez-Lavega.

Numerical Simulations and Future Research

In a third set of numerical experiments, the research team explored the generation of the GRS from a known instability in the winds that is thought to be capable of producing an elongated cell that encloses and traps them. Such a cell would be a proto-GRS, a nascent Red Spot, whose subsequent shrinkage would give rise to the compact and rapidly rotating GRS observed in the late 19th century. The formation of large elongated cells has already been observed in the genesis of other major vortices on Jupiter.

“In our simulations, supercomputers enabled us to discover that the elongated cells are stable when they rotate around the periphery of the GRS at the speed of Jupiter’s winds, as would be expected when they form because of this instability,” said Enrique García-Melendo, researcher in the UPC’s Department of Physics. Using two different types of numerical models, one at the UPV/EHU and the other at the UPC, the researchers concluded that if the rotational speed of the proto-GRS is lower than that of the surrounding winds, the proto-GRS will break up, making the formation of a stable vortex impossible. And, if it is very high, the properties of the proto-GRS differ from those of the current GRS.

Future research will aim to try and reproduce the shrinkage of the GRS over time in order to find out, in greater detail, the physical mechanisms underlying its sustainability over time. At the same time, it will try to predict whether the GRS will disintegrate and disappear when it reaches a size limit, as might have occurred to Cassini’s PS, or whether it will stabilize at a size limit at which it may last for many more years.

Reference: “The Origin of Jupiter’s Great Red Spot” by Agustín Sánchez-Lavega, Enrique García-Melendo, Jon Legarreta, Arnau Miró, Manel Soria and Kevin Ahrens-Velásquez, 16 June 2024, Geophysical Research Letters. DOI: 10.1029/2024GL108993

0 人喜欢

Comments

There is no comment, let's add the first one.

弦圈热门内容

面具下的自我:《西力传》中的个体困境

来自 热心市民年糕先生 的 投稿 :1983年,伍迪·艾伦执导的虚构纪录片《西力传》上映后立即引发轰动。简单来说,主人公莱昂纳德·西力是一个特殊的人,他能够根据周围环境迅速改变自己的外表和性格,成为一个“完美的镜子”,反射周遭人的一举一动。他就像一根柔软的芦苇,随环境风吹草动。01#理想自我的困境西力的“特殊能力”恰恰凸显了普通人在社会生活中也面临的困境:我们时常会为了讨好他人、获得认同而隐藏内心的真实想法,扮演一个“理想的自我”。我们会在不同的社交场合下带上各式各样的“面具”,以适应环境期待。然而区别在于,西力已经把这种现象发挥到了极致——他看似拥有百变的人格,实则丧失了独立的自我。西力的人格是如此脆弱不堪,以至于最微弱的环境变化都能引发他的改变。他就像海绵一样吸收周围的特征。这似乎揭示了一个令人不安的事实:我们的自我认同其实并不如想象中那样坚固,它极易受到外在力量的影响和操纵。02#one?A面。从社会学的角度看,个体之所以会产生强烈的"他者依赖",在于个体需要通过社会互动建立自我认同。正如符号互动论者米德所言,个体的自我意识来源于他人对自己的定义和期待。个体通过扮演社会角色获得认 ...

有兄弟知道李代数那本书比较好吗

目前在做机器人,想学习李代数的知识咨询一下各位大佬

数学圈小众中的小众

运营弦圈这么长时间,我终于发现一个事实就是:小众圈子千千万万,而数学圈则是小众中的小众,才是真正的小众😎!对于这句话是不是有种熟悉的感觉:20世纪代数几何天才很多,但上帝只有Grothendieck一个。😇由于目前弦圈的人气比较低,并且经过我多次艰难的尝试,效果都挺一般,短期内看这个问题应该不太能改善。毕竟我只是个没钱没人脉的普通人,唯有一腔热血😅。但这不影响我的决心和计划,我想要给弦圈引入更多的小众圈子,让大家能够鉴赏更多的小众文化,这种理念是来源于数学的。在我看来,数学是包容的,能够将宇宙万物都融入其内,因此数学文化是开明的,能够跟无数其他文化相互交织,从而碰撞出火花。在是否存在人类大脑永远无法理解的数学结构?这篇文章中,我曾提到宇宙能否完全被数学所解释是一个理念之争,而我所持的观点即是爱因斯坦的那种,所有的一切都能被简洁、美妙、优雅的数学所描述。在了解了很多的圈子,尤其是小众圈子,以及跟不少数学圈外的人交流后,我才发现似乎很难找个一个比数学圈更小众的圈子。大家都说数学+学术实在是太小众了。在我这个沉浸于数学圈多年的人看来,很多其他所谓的小众圈子一点都不小众,比如说二次元圈、铁路迷 ...

如果中国拿了菲尔兹奖,那中国是不是可以算作数学强国了?

我的回答:如果中国有持续培养纯本土菲尔兹奖得主的能力,那么才可算作数学强国。这东西都得谈可持续性,不能因为个别一两个华人拿了菲尔兹奖就觉得很厉害了。现在中国很多杰出的年轻一辈数学家,都是接受过海外教育的,或者在海外任职的,证明中国数学界还脱离不了国外的培养体系。一个中国国籍的学者经过国外的教育后得到菲尔兹奖,与一个华裔学者在国外得到菲尔兹奖,除了能够满足民族自信心外,没多大区别。Yuhang Liu的回答:等中国自己建设的数学期刊进入中科院自己评的一区再说吧。我不记得中国科学-数学是不是一区,别的应该都不是。这也不是什么不合理的要求。Annals 本来也就相当于普林的一个校刊而已。你有足够多学术地位受认可的编辑,然后华人数学家把自己的大作品都往这上面投,学术地位高了,自然国外的牛人也会往中国的期刊投稿。若是连这一步都不敢想象,也不必谈数学强国了。家里蹲大学的回答:谢邀,你是想说最近王虹解决三维Fakeya猜想的工作吗?即使拿了,我也不觉得这么认为,如果一枚菲尔茨奖章就作为数学强国,我想 巴西,越南,韩国,都可以算作数学强国了。如果有一天,本土(所有教育都在国内完成)真的出现了获得菲尔茨 ...

中国教育最大的成功在哪里?谈谈中国教育的优点

珑霖君的回答:清华大学,计算机水平,2018年最新数据,世界第一。一年5000元,四年20000元,相当于3100美元。走绿色通道,学费毕业后再交。去不发达地区就业,学费全免。我堂妹美国加州大学洛杉矶分校,读计算机,一年70000美元,四年280000美元,相当于176万人民币。排名还不如清华大学。二叔的家庭在美国属于中产偏上了,面对这笔巨款也是卖了国内的房才能支付。就这点,我真心觉得中国教育在给寒门学子留出路。数据来源:2018年全球最佳大学排行榜:清华大学计算机专业排名全球第一刚一天就10K的赞,吓尿。————————鉴于答案很火,也跑个题,说两句这种低廉教育的弊端,就是对个人的严重不尊重。我国教育是一种低成本的“工业化”教育,一个班里多个学生的成本也仅仅是多套桌椅,目的是最大程度普及教育,保障尽量多人的受教育权。但是也很容易把所有人培养成一模一样的人,并且充满了粗暴的强制性,我有时候觉得中国的教育根本就不是教育,而是一种强硬的规训。加上我国的这种集体主义,对部分人很摧残。比如我这种很自我的人,极其厌恶这种教育方式,也导致了我对于集体的严重反感。这让我小学和中学这12年很痛苦,到了 ...

国内的教育体系已崩溃?如何客观地看待中国应试教育?

NIO倒闭了嘛的回答:国内的教育体系趁着2024年的就业市场反馈已经崩盘了,大部分人大四和硕士期间的实习日薪还没现在补课的时薪高。绝大部分人读十几年书不如去学捏十年寿司,现在想靠卷高考翻身就跟1900年梭哈科举差不多了。十年前大家只是调侃一下文编理润,但那时候二本靠谱点的考编都是一次上岸,区别就是上哪里的。二本理科读个江苏大学,上海理工这种级别的硕士,三十岁也能混到三十万的年薪。江苏大学和上海理工进个上汽泛亚校招22W当年是有手就行,有点实力的应届生都能拿到30+的年薪。2024年的行情大致就是,高中本科硕士十年的培训完的80%的人时薪是干不过隔壁日本的零工。而且大部分工科硕士的就业环境真比便利店差远了。便利店至少不会爆炸和时不时冒出来一个工伤,也没什么难闻的气味和可吸入粉尘。而文科方面,十几年前大家印象还是硕士还来银行?24年是双非硕士还敢投我们银行的简历?除了编制外,文科整体就业就靠新东方一类的第三产业挽尊,去个新东方还能看见落地玻璃和高楼,不用面对奇奇怪怪的人。而其他招文科的制造业普遍都是杵在车间隔壁开个四五千的月薪,时不时要面对一下油腻领导的骚扰。而现在广告,传媒,游戏,留学这 ...

为何似乎中国大学教育那么烂,却在科技上看似大有成就?

体制老司机​的回答:中国的教育没那么烂。杨振宁对中国教育讲过一段话,大意是:中国的教育模式,对大多数90分以下的学生,是非常好的,能让这些学生更快地成材。美国的基础教育太过注重个性发展,非常的松散,如果不是很优秀的孩子,在美国的教育环境里,容易放任自我,养成一些不良习性。而本身很优秀的孩子,也就是90分以上的孩子,在美国的教育环境里面,反而能够发挥出自己的特长,取得人生的成功。杨振宁这段话比较委婉地批评了,中国的教育,对于那些最优秀的孩子成长,是不利的,对这些人还是不够尊重其个性和自由。所以,中国的教育,能培养出世界上数量最多的基本素质不错的产业工人,也能培养出世界上最多的工程师等中高端人才。但是,中国在最最顶尖的人才教育培养上,和美国等西方最先进的国家相比,还是有明显的差距的。因此,中国的制造业全世界第一,电子产品、玩具服装,以及什么高楼大厦、铁路公路、大水坝等基建工程建设,大型机械等等,都是世界数一数二的。但毫无疑问,在非常基础的科学研究方面,比如物理、化学、数学等等,和英美差距还是较大。在非常尖端的技术上,也有很大的差距。比如说光刻机、芯片、材料等等。杰克马也讲过一段话,大致意思 ...

关于中国教育的根本问题

关于中国教育的根本问题。还是听听两个外国人的一针见血。给大家介绍两个德国人。第一个,名叫西洛特,最近因对中国教育的一番控诉刷爆了中国的互联网。他在苏州一所私立学校当外教,一干就是八年,但春节前,他离职回国了。他是带着挫败感离开的,他说:“我一辈子也无法在中国看到真正的教育!”他在中国看到4岁的孩子背诵拼音,5岁的孩子做加减法。而在德国,8岁的孩子只需要会播种,栽花,除草。从幼儿园起,中国的学生就不断被灌输政治教育,这些对几岁甚至十几岁的孩子来说,简直是天书,就连很多政治老师也搞不懂,这些教育的功能只是为了应付试卷上的标准答案,别无用处,大多数学生的学习目标也是短暂的——为了考试。与此同时,人性教育、逻辑教育却是空白。人性是人格的基础,缺乏人性体验和认识的人,又怎么形成健全的人格呢,连健全的人格都没有,又拿什么爱自己,爱家人,爱社会呢?西洛特还认为,中国教育的扭曲还体现在安全教育方面。很多学校实行的是无缝对接管理,从学生进门到出校门,每一分每一秒都有老师看着,下一个老师不到,上一个老师不能离开。就像看管羊圈一样。放学时,离学校不足50米的地方,是密密麻麻的家长及形形色色的车辆。孩子到家后 ...

弦圈如何完成新手任务和每日任务 - 任务中心介绍

在弦圈你可以完成新手任务和每日任务,然后获得任务奖励。如何进入任务中心界面呢?首先进入个人中心接着在左侧菜单栏,点击任务中心这时我们就能看到新手任务和每日打卡任务。新手任务,顾名思义是给刚注册弦圈的用户准备的一次性任务,目的是让他快速熟悉弦圈的各个功能和板块。每日打卡任务,就是每天都可以完成一次的任务,希望能够给弦圈的用户一种真实的成长的感觉,让大家使用弦圈能够有更多的正反馈。需要注意的是,新手任务完成后,需要前往任务中心领取奖励,而每日任务完成后,奖励会自动发放,无需每次都前往任务中心。